Nov 10, 2023  •  For Sale  •  38 Comments

351 V8 / 4-Speed! 1972 Ford Mustang Mach 1

Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from some link clicks and purchases.

Ford rolled out the Mach 1 option on the Mustang in 1969 to perk up sales which had been falling since competition entered the “pony car” field. But the Mach 1 soon became more of an image product rather than a performance car. The base engine in 1972 was a 302 V8 and the 429 Cobra Jet had disappeared thanks to rising insurance premiums. This sweet ’72 Mach 1 looks great at 42,000 miles and is original except for one repaint. Located in Citrus Heights, California, this dark green beauty is available here on craigslist for $36,500.  Another swell tip brought to us by ToddK!

Mach 1 sales were still a big factor in the Mustang push, but it didn’t seem to help overall. Production was down to just over 125,000 units in 1972, the Mustang’s worst sales year since the mania began in the prior decade. Yet 27,675 copies of the Mach 1 rolled off the assembly line, including this one with a 351 cubic-inch 4-barrel with Ram Air Induction. It also has a 4-speed manual transmission, which should have been added up to one of the perkiest Mustangs at your local Ford dealer.

The seller suggests that you could either restore this Ford or enjoy driving it as-is. I would opt for the latter because nothing pressing seems to suggest otherwise. The mileage is low, it’s a well-equipped car, and its one repainted in the original color looks to have held up well with no signs of rust. The seller contends that few were produced with the combination of options this Mustang has, like factory air conditioning. A Marti Report would help shed light on any rarities that might apply here.

The ’72 Mustang has a few more emissions tweaks than the ’71, but fewer than the ’73 so perhaps this is the one to get if you like the bigger editions of first-generation Mustangs. After 1973, the car would shrink to subcompact proportions and be powered by 4-cylinder engines as economy won out over performance. Times were changing and who would have thought then you’d have an electric-powered car named Mustang 50 years later?

SHARETWEETEMAIL
Get Daily Email Updates:
Click here for more options

Auctions Ending Soon

Comments

  1. Fahrvergnugen FahrvergnugenMember
    Nov 10, 2023 at 10:42am

    Unfortunate dash cap. Otherwise color me green!

    Like 7
    • Elijah burns
      Nov 11, 2023 at 12:39pm

      First car I leaned to drive a 4 speed in.
      It was a teacher’s car in auto lab back in the early 70’s.

      Like 2
  2. Bob_in_TN Bob_in_TNMember
    Nov 10, 2023 at 11:52am

    The 71-73 Mustangs aren’t as well-liked primarily because of their increased size and weight. But to me they still look good, with the emphasis on their long proportions (e.g. the hood) and the fastback roofline. I like them in dark colors like this attractive green, over the silver lower body accent.

    This example looks pretty good. Don’t see too many with manual transmissions.

    Like 28
    • Paul S in TX
      Nov 10, 2023 at 5:53pm

      I agree. I’m not a big fan of the 71-73 Mustangs either but this is a good looking car. This would be a fun car to own.

      Like 17
  3. Tommy T-Tops
    Nov 10, 2023 at 6:15pm

    I remember a Steven Segal movie Marked for Death where he was driving one of these, black with a blower coming out of the hood. Pretty cool chase and fight scene. I liked this body style ever since. Glwta

    Like 9
    • Neil R Norris
      Nov 11, 2023 at 7:38am

      Oh yah … anything the great actor Steven Segal drove HAS to be good.

      Like 4
  4. David Littlefield
    Nov 10, 2023 at 7:19pm

    Didn’t James Bond drive one of this era in a movie? Can’t think of the name of it???

    Like 7
    • Tom
      Nov 11, 2023 at 8:34am

      Diamonds are forever. He drove it in Las Vegas.

      Like 12
      • Buddy Ruff
        Nov 11, 2023 at 4:35pm

        On two wheels at one point, I think.

        Like 1
    • Shuttle Guy Shuttle GuyMember
      Nov 11, 2023 at 9:55am

      Red

      Like 1
  5. Paul S in TX
    Nov 10, 2023 at 7:51pm

    He drove a 1964 k code convertible in Gold Finger and a 1971 mach 1 in Diamonds are Forever.

    Like 12
    • Midway
      Nov 11, 2023 at 4:24pm

      The Ford Ranchero in gold finger was very special, had an F350 rear suspension. Due to it hauling that pressed ’68 Lincoln back from the wrecking yard.

      Like 1
  6. Beauwayne5000
    Nov 10, 2023 at 8:14pm

    It’d be a huge hit here in Germany I’ve seen very few for sale, after shipping add 20-30k$ easy

    Like 3
  7. Davey Boy
    Nov 11, 2023 at 1:06am

    My mom had a 71 coupe. 302 2 bbl. Carb. 3 speed floor shift. Not rocket ship fast but still fun to drive. This on the other hand looks like it would be a”BLAST”. Really like the color combo also.

    Like 7
  8. D
    Nov 11, 2023 at 2:32am

    There is no such thing as a mustang suv, wtf are you taking about?!

    Like 1
    • Big C
      Nov 11, 2023 at 7:04am

      I think he means that weird ‘lectric thing that Ford stuck the Mustang name on.

      Like 4
  9. Dart 340
    Nov 11, 2023 at 7:01am

    Yes 1971 Mach 1 in Diamonds Are Forever w Sean Connery.

    Like 3
    • Christopher Gentry
      Nov 11, 2023 at 10:30am

      It was the female interest that odd job adding killing that drove the 65 convertable, white over red. Bond uses DB5 wire wheel hubs to disable it as an excuse to meat the girl.

      Like 3
  10. James Smith
    Nov 11, 2023 at 10:33am

    I’ve got a 71 mach1 with a 351 cleveland, 3 speed auto. It’s in the paint shop right now being painted victory red. It’s fast and i like it.

    Like 9
  11. Christopher Gentry
    Nov 11, 2023 at 10:36am

    Oh and he got driven in a blue (I think) 66 in I believe, You only live twice , that’s when he makes the comment “fly this way often ?”

    Like 0
  12. Lincoln BMember
    Nov 11, 2023 at 10:50am

    I am unable to view the vehicle or the write-up I can read all the comments and nothing else. Is anyone else having trouble?

    Like 1
    • Mike76
      Nov 11, 2023 at 12:21pm

      BF has been kinda “fritzy” the past few days on my end. Sometimes it seems to freeze, like when typing out a comment. Try refreshing and wait for page to load entirely before scrolling.

      Like 2
      • Lincoln BMember
        Nov 11, 2023 at 12:25pm

        Thanks I will and will restart all devices.

        Like 0
  13. PL
    Nov 11, 2023 at 12:33pm

    4bbl w/Ram Air was unavailable in ’72, 2bbl only.

    Like 2
    • Paul S in TX
      Nov 11, 2023 at 12:44pm

      There were 4 engine options available in 1972… a 302 Wndsor 2 barrel 140 hp… a 351 Cleveland 2 barrel 177 hp… a 351 Cleveland CJ 4 barrel 266 hp… and a 351 Cleveland HO 4 barrel 275 hp

      Like 2
      • Keith
        Nov 12, 2023 at 12:45pm

        I would rather have the 351 windsor modified 400

        Like 1
    • Paul S in TX
      Nov 11, 2023 at 12:47pm

      PL, you are right about the Ram Air…

      Like 1
    • Allen
      Nov 11, 2023 at 6:19pm

      Ram air was factory Available on 2V only due to EPA cert. On a 4V it was a dealer installed option.

      Like 1
  14. Twice bitten
    Nov 11, 2023 at 5:02pm

    Nobody gets the 351 Cleveland with the 4 barely. In 72 that put you up there with the hevey hitters. The big block chevelles the cudas the Trans am. A very special vehicle. Big and over sized maybe but look what it is and the time it was born. I find a perfect time machine to cruise in and enjoy it for what it is. The last Horan before the end of an era.would be proud to own it perfect driver.

    Like 1
  15. Rocky Vadala
    Nov 11, 2023 at 9:09pm

    in my opinion there was no better production engine than the 351 Cleveland. Toughest and strongest stock engine i’ve ever owned. mine was in a 79 ford bronco

    Like 2
    • Paul S in TX
      Nov 11, 2023 at 9:25pm

      I agree. The 351 Cleveland was a great engine and Ford kept the claimed horsepower figures down because of the insurance companies. I have a friend that had a beefed up 1968 Acapulco Blue fastback Mustang GT S code and he could never beat another friend’s 1969 Mach I with a 351 Cleveland. The 68 beat the Cleveland off the line but by the time they both hit 3rd gear, the Mach I was passing him by…. he was always frustrated by that car. They were both awesome cars.

      Like 1
    • CATHOUSE
      Nov 13, 2023 at 9:19pm

      A 1979 Bronco would not have had a 351C in it. The Broncos used the 351M or 400M. The C and M engines are different and do not interchange. To put a C in where a M once was would require changing the transmission as the bell housing bolt pattern is different.

      Like 1
      • Keith
        Nov 13, 2023 at 9:32pm

        CATHOUSE he could have had a 351 Cleveland in his 79 Bronco sine he doesn’t say anything about the transmission or bell housing. Who knows if he did or didn’t the only thing that you can go bye is what he says unless you see the paperwork on it and inspect it yourself

        Like 0
      • Rocky Vadala
        Nov 13, 2023 at 9:51pm

        It was a 79 Ford Bronco XLT from California. Came with stock brushed aluminum wheels, capt seats, brown over tan. Had a built 351 Cleveland and stainless steel straight pipes. Original owner was a drag racer who ran the bronco on the dunes with 33 inch tires. Ran like a raped ape

        Like 0
  16. Sterling Farris
    Nov 11, 2023 at 10:39pm

    Wow…..thanks for sharing your knowledge of the 351 Cleveland I currently own a 72 Cougar XR7 with a 351 Cleveland it had a aftermarket 2 bbl carb I switched it out for 4 bbl manifold fi-tech EFI it scoots

    Like 2
  17. PRA4SNW PRA4SNWMember
    Nov 12, 2023 at 2:40pm

    Look at that, 3 cars later and I have the answer to the question I asked on the ’72 Cougar posting. I guessed that a same year, same condition Mach I would be 10K more. Looks like we are talking more like 15K.
    I would save the $$ and go for the cat.

    Like 2
  18. 59poncho
    Nov 16, 2023 at 11:37am

    BARN FINDS……….what is the wordpress BS I am seeing on some listings when I try and open? Some open fine, others do not.
    Just started Nov 16th

    Like 0
    • PRA4SNW PRA4SNWMember
      Nov 16, 2023 at 11:39am

      They are having some sort of website issue.
      My advice is to hold on and they will have it fixed soon enough.

      Like 0

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

*

Get new comment updates via email. Or subscribe without commenting.

Barn Finds