Tidy Survivor: 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Aerocoupe
Aerodynamics is the black art of motorsport, with teams in categories like Formula 1 spending millions of dollars to squeeze every millisecond out of their machinery. Virtually every racing category follows the same process to some extent, including NASCAR. This 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS is a perfect example, as the company sought to improve race results with its Aerocoupe derivative. This one is a tidy survivor, although lifting its presentation would not be difficult or expensive. It is listed here on eBay in Staunton, Illinois. Bidding sits at $7,600, although that figure is below the reserve.
This shot helps demonstrate the defining feature of the Aerocoupe. NASCAR would not stand for a repeat of the “Winged Warriors” era of 1969 and 1970, meaning manufacturers needed to find more subtle ways to extract better aerodynamic efficiency and downforce from their competition models. This became critical at tracks like Daytona and Talladega, where speeds topped 200mph. The answer was a “slipperier” nose and a sloping back window to channel air onto the rear spoiler. It is a look not favored by everyone, but Chevrolet found itself in the enviable situation where demand outstripped supply in the first year. This Monte Carlo is from the second and final production run and presents well as a survivor. Its Dark Red paint shines nicely, with no major issues or problems. There are small chips and marks across the exterior, but the overall condition is acceptable for a driver-grade vehicle. The panels are straight, the plastic shows no signs of deterioration, and this classic is rust-free. It retains its original alloy wheels that sport some marks and scratches, but there are no glass issues.
The interior is where this Aerocoupe falls down, showing some significant damage and deterioration. The dash pad sports plenty of cracks, and since replacements retail for around $720, the winning bidder must decide whether the car is worth the investment. It is worth noting that Aerocoupe values are climbing well above the market average, which may provide ample justification for spending more than the cost of a simple cover to hide the problem. The outer edge of the driver’s seat has wear, while the grab handle is missing from the driver’s door. Otherwise, the condition is acceptable for a survivor. The original stereo has made way for an aftermarket unit, but there are no other visible changes. Comfort and convenience features include air conditioning, power windows, cruise control, and a tilt wheel.
The Monte Carlo SS was considered a 1980s muscle car, but that definition blurred during The Malaise Era. Its 305ci V8 sent 180hp to the road via a four-speed automatic transmission. Performance was all you might expect from a car weighing 3,525 lbs with such a modest amount of power on tap. Chevrolet’s official performance figures make for interesting reading and expose the fact that the homologation special was not as potent on our streets as its more conservative sibling. The ¼-mile gallop took 17 seconds, with its V8 running out of breath at 119mph. The Aerocoupe weighs 58 lbs more than a regular SS, and this difference is felt under acceleration. The standard SS took 16.6 seconds to cover the ¼-mile, while the top speed climbed to 126mph. However, the Aerocoupe was a better track proposition, which is common with vehicles of this type. The seller provides no information on how this Chevy runs or drives, but they supply this YouTube video of the car running. Its engine sounds healthy, with no smoke or odd noises.
Chevrolet introduced the Monte Carlo SS Aerocoupe as a toe-in-the-water exercise in 1986 purely for NASCAR homologation. It produced the required 200 examples to qualify for competition. Demand far outstripped supply, and the Aerocoupe returned for an encore in 1987. The company easily sold 6,052 before discontinuing the model. Its attention turned to the Lumina as its new front-line racing machine, ending a brief but shining moment in the Monte Carlo’s history. Prices vary widely, but the overall condition should see this car comfortably hit $15,000. However, with values rising dramatically in the past year, I wouldn’t rule out a higher figure. With the possibility that this Aerocoupe could be a rock-solid investment, would you consider dropping a bid on this classic?
Auctions Ending Soon
1965 Ford Falcon Station WagonBid Now2 days$2,300
2002 Jaguar XK8 ConvertibleBid Now3 days$5,250
1979 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28Bid Now4 days$4,500
1960 Dodge D300Bid Now4 days$300
2006 Ford Mustang Saleen S281 SCBid Now6 days$100
Comments
SS striping is missing which makes me believe the car was repainted or in accident. I had the same car in black without the Aero option (never cared for it) Also the claims made by the seller as to other features specific to the Aerocoupe are on all SS models
He does state it’s a Monte Carlo SS Aerocoupe. He doesn’t say it has more options than an SS, just that it has more options than a Monte Carlo, because it is an SS.
It just needs a “mailaise makeover” under the hood,there seems to be a few hundred horsepower missing….
i would agree repaint… the flip down licence plate holder is usually unfinished galvanized like metal… here it is painted
sharp otherwise. Owned 2 gp aerocoupes and the window is MUCH larger making trunk opening that much smaller…No interior pix of trunk and the floor/hump/frame over rear diff is common to rot. At least you could work on it!
One of the best looking cars that I have owned (IMHO), but one of the worst driving cars that I have ever owned (that’s a fact) : ) Too slow for words, and a very weak transmission on top of that. Put one in the garage and look at it, or offer up a transplant with something that has a bit more sauce.
The 200R4 trans is plenty strong for the Monte Carlo engine, they easily handle 300 HP and 275 lb/ft of torque stock, more than the anemic 305 can possibly dish out. The stock input shaft can handle 550 hp. A built 200R4 can withstand 800 hp. The 200R4 was also used in the Buick Grand national with some factory upgrades. I had 2 MC/SS’s and two Grand Nationals, never experienced any trans issues, and one of the GN’s was mildly modified and ran 11:90’s around 115 all day long, never an issue. The handled well, especially with 2 inch drop, as well an improvement in the looks. The wheezy 305 was no powerhouse, but with the trans low gear of 2:74 and a 3:73 rear gearing it actually had decent acceleration. The .67 overdrive was the bomb! I’m looking for a 200R4 to install in my 70 El Camino SS396, it will hold up well with the big block and fits in the car without any major modifications or surgery.
89-94 there was no Monte Carlo, but from 95-07 it made a return as a NASCAR racer and still available SS, albeit front wheel drive…
Hood doesn’t seem to fit right. Gaps indicate possible front end damage.
A co-worker at the GM hardware plant in Trenton, NJ, had one just like this. Might even be his here(?). It was cool and this is all that mattered in the era. ‘Are you going to get a nice planter for your rolling greenhouse, Bob?’ I asked. He didn’t see the humor in it. 😔
I couldn’t understand why the flush, composite style headlamps weren’t adapted to this model.
They were a nice looking car but they were much slower than what else was out there. The Grand National, 5.0 Mustang, and even the Mopar 2.2 turbo Omni’s and Chargers would blow the doors off of it. Over time people started to do GM crate 350 swaps to give them more power. The rusted quickly and the quality was not so good. Chevy could have really done a better job here.
I have a complete set of NOS stripes for this car in my stash of parts. I had a 1988 Monte SS in this color more than 30 years ago. I began buying GM parts for it as I planned to keep it. Well, that changed and the car was sold in 1993, for $9,300. The police officer I sold it to still has it.